Re: [UrbanSim-Users] Problem in DPLCM results

Hakim,

The gridcell attributes are updated by the events_coordinator model, in
combination with the development_event_transition_model. Do you run
these two models? And did you run them in your experiment with the
Eugene data?

FYI, one event is a collection of projects to be applied to one
gridcell. The development_event_transition_model creates those events
from the results of the development_project_... models and the
events_coordinator model 'builds' them, i.e. applies them to gridcells.

In case you do run those two models, could you please send a few log
files and some indicator results where we could see the inconsistency?
Also, please try to export the gridcells table into your database (with
opus_core/tools/do_export_cache_to_sql_database.py, using the '-t'
option) and check manually if e.g. residential_units haven't changed in
comparison to the baseyear.

Thanks,

Hana

Hakim OUARAS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We implemented a new development project model, it run without any bug until
> the last year.
> In the log file we noticed that there are some projects created, but when we
> view the results with the indicators tool haven't any change in the values
> of development variables, like residential_units.
>
> We observe the same problem when we ran Eugene database with only
> development project models (note that we ran the development project models
> with household (transition and location) models to have some projects
> created).
>
> When we ran all models with Eugene database we haven't this problem, there
> are evolution in development variable values. In the Paris database we have
> always the problem even if we run all models.
>
> We think that the projects are created but the are note located, but why
> does not work in Eugene!
>
> Paris team
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users_at_urbansim.org
> http://www.urbansim.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Received on Mon Nov 19 2007 - 09:27:48 PST